El Salvador is at a crossroads. Recent constitutional changes, pushed through by President Nayib Bukele’s New Ideas party, have opened the door for indefinite presidential reelection and extended presidential terms to six years. This move raises serious concerns about the future of democracy in the Central American nation. While Bukele enjoys high approval ratings due to his tough stance on gang violence, critics argue that these changes consolidate power and undermine democratic institutions.
This article delves into the details of these constitutional changes, exploring the arguments for and against them. We’ll examine the potential implications for El Salvador’s political landscape and its relationship with the international community. Furthermore, we will investigate how this decision is perceived both domestically and abroad, offering a comprehensive overview of this pivotal moment in El Salvador’s history.
Constitutional Changes: A Detailed Overview
On July 31, 2025, El Salvador’s National Assembly approved significant changes to the constitution. Lawmaker Ana Figueroa of the New Ideas party proposed amendments to five articles, most notably allowing presidents to seek reelection indefinitely and extending presidential terms from five to six years. The proposal also eliminated the need for a second round in presidential elections.
These changes were swiftly approved due to the supermajority held by Bukele’s party and its allies. The vote passed with 57 in favor and only three opposed, highlighting the extent of Bukele’s influence in the legislative body. Figueroa defended the changes by arguing that other elected officials, such as federal lawmakers and mayors, already have the right to seek reelection as many times as they want.
Figueroa stated, ‘All of them have had the possibility of reelection through popular vote, the only exception until now has been the presidency.’ This argument suggests that the changes aim to level the playing field and grant the presidency the same rights as other elected offices. However, critics argue that the presidency holds a unique position of power, making indefinite reelection a dangerous prospect.
Opposition Response: Concerns for Democracy
The constitutional changes have sparked strong opposition from various political factions and civil society groups. Marcela Villatoro of the Nationalist Republican Alliance (Arena) voiced her concerns, stating that ‘Democracy in El Salvador has died!’ Her statement reflects the fear that indefinite reelection could lead to an accumulation of power and a weakening of democratic institutions.
Villatoro further warned, ‘You don’t realize what indefinite reelection brings: It brings an accumulation of power and weakens democracy… there’s corruption and clientelism because nepotism grows and halts democracy and political participation.’ These concerns highlight the potential for abuse of power and the erosion of checks and balances that are essential for a healthy democracy.
Despite the opposition’s concerns, Suecy Callejas, the assembly’s vice president, defended the changes, stating that ‘power has returned to the only place that it truly belongs… to the Salvadoran people.’ This statement suggests that the changes are seen as a way to empower the electorate and allow them to decide who should lead the country, regardless of term limits.
Bukele’s Previous Reelection and Constitutional Ban
The recent constitutional changes come on the heels of Bukele’s controversial reelection in the previous year. Despite a constitutional ban on consecutive presidential terms, Supreme Court justices, selected by Bukele’s party, ruled in 2021 that he could seek a second five-year term. This decision was widely criticized as a manipulation of the legal system to favor the incumbent president.
Bukele’s ability to circumvent the constitutional ban highlights the extent of his influence over the country’s institutions. Critics argue that this sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the rule of law. The recent approval of indefinite reelection further solidifies Bukele’s grip on power and raises concerns about the future of presidential term limits in El Salvador.
The international community has also expressed concern over Bukele’s actions. Many observers view these changes as a step towards authoritarianism and a departure from democratic norms. The United States and other countries have urged El Salvador to uphold its constitutional principles and ensure free and fair elections.
Proposed Timeline Adjustment: Consolidating Power
In addition to allowing indefinite reelection, the proposed constitutional changes include an adjustment to Bukele’s current term. Figueroa suggested that his term, originally scheduled to end on June 1, 2029, should instead conclude on June 1, 2027. This adjustment would align presidential and congressional elections, potentially streamlining the electoral process.
However, critics argue that this timeline adjustment is a strategic move to allow Bukele to seek reelection to a longer term two years earlier than originally planned. This would give him a significant advantage in the upcoming elections and further consolidate his power. The opposition views this as another example of Bukele manipulating the system to remain in office.
The proposed timeline adjustment has fueled further debate and controversy surrounding the constitutional changes. It raises questions about the motivations behind these changes and whether they are truly in the best interest of the Salvadoran people. The international community is closely monitoring the situation and urging El Salvador to ensure that any electoral reforms are conducted in a transparent and democratic manner.
Bukele’s Popularity: The Fight Against Gang Violence
Despite the controversy surrounding the constitutional changes, President Bukele remains highly popular in El Salvador. His popularity is largely attributed to his heavy-handed approach to combating the country’s powerful street gangs. Bukele’s administration has implemented a state of emergency that has led to the arrest and imprisonment of tens of thousands of suspected gang members.
While these measures have been praised by many Salvadorans who feel safer as a result, they have also raised concerns about human rights abuses. Critics argue that the state of emergency has led to arbitrary arrests, excessive force, and a lack of due process. However, Bukele’s supporters argue that these measures are necessary to restore order and security in a country that has long been plagued by gang violence.
Bukele’s success in reducing gang violence has inspired imitators in the region who seek to replicate his style. However, concerns remain about the long-term impact of his policies on democracy and human rights. The international community is urging El Salvador to find a balance between security and respect for fundamental freedoms.
El Salvador at a Crossroads: Democracy or Authoritarianism?
The recent constitutional changes in El Salvador mark a critical juncture in the country’s history. The approval of indefinite presidential reelection and the extension of presidential terms raise serious questions about the future of democracy in the nation. While President Bukele enjoys widespread popularity due to his efforts to combat gang violence, critics argue that these changes consolidate power and undermine democratic institutions.
The international community is closely monitoring the situation, urging El Salvador to uphold its constitutional principles and ensure free and fair elections. The future of El Salvador hangs in the balance, as the country grapples with the challenge of balancing security with respect for fundamental freedoms. The path it chooses will have far-reaching implications for the region and the world.
Leave a Reply