The much-anticipated sequel to 2003’s ‘Freaky Friday,’ titled ‘Freakier Friday,’ has arrived, bringing Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan back to the screen. However, initial impressions suggest that this revisit to the body-swap comedy might not live up to the original’s charm. The movie introduces new characters and a convoluted plot that extends the mystical switcheroo to four individuals, leading to a series of comedic mishaps and potentially cringeworthy moments.
In ‘Freakier Friday,’ Tess (Jamie Lee Curtis) is now a podcasting psychologist, while Anna (Lindsay Lohan) has traded her rock star dreams for motherhood. The introduction of Anna’s teenage daughter, Harper, and her soon-to-be stepsister, Lily, sets the stage for a new round of body-swapping chaos. But does this sequel capture the breezy, observant charm of the original, or does it fall into the trap of nostalgia-driven mediocrity? This review delves into the highs and lows of ‘Freakier Friday,’ examining its performances, plot, and overall contribution to the current landscape of sequels and remakes.
The Four-Way Body Swap: A Recipe for Disaster?
The core concept of ‘Freakier Friday’ revolves around a magical body swap, but this time, it’s not just mother and daughter. The film amplifies the chaos by involving Harper and Lily, resulting in a four-way switch. This expanded premise, however, seems to dilute the original’s focus on the mother-daughter dynamic, leading to a more scattered and less impactful narrative. The older women revel in the freedom of their younger bodies, indulging in carefree eating and scooter rides, while the teenagers grapple with the indignities of being trapped in adult forms, including navigating adult diapers and the realities of aging.
According to a TIME review, ‘In Freakier Friday, the mind-body switcheroo goes four ways, and more is less.’ This sentiment encapsulates the film’s struggle to balance multiple character arcs and comedic situations. The result is a film that feels overstuffed and lacking the emotional resonance of its predecessor.
Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan: A Shadow of Their Former Selves?
While the return of Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan is a major draw for audiences, their performances in ‘Freakier Friday’ have been met with mixed reactions. Lindsay Lohan, despite her undeniable talent, appears to be constrained by her character’s wardrobe choices and the overall direction of the film. Jamie Lee Curtis, on the other hand, seems to be trying her best with the material, but is ultimately let down by the movie’s reliance on cheap gags and stereotypical portrayals of older adults.
As TIME Magazine notes, ‘Lohan, a gifted actor whose career has had some shaky turns, is left to build a performance on her costumes… Curtis fares even worse: she’s more good-natured than she needs to be about the movie’s adult-diaper gags.’ This critique highlights the film’s failure to leverage the talents of its leading actresses, instead relying on tired tropes and predictable humor.
The Problem with Sequels: Is Hollywood Out of Ideas?
‘Freakier Friday’ is just one example of Hollywood’s current obsession with sequels and remakes. This summer’s releases are filled with familiar titles, from ‘Happy Gilmore 2’ to reboots of classic comic book characters. While nostalgia can be a powerful marketing tool, the over-reliance on existing properties raises questions about the industry’s creativity and willingness to take risks.
The article from TIME argues that ‘It’s as if Hollywood—or what now passes for it—were executing a masterplan to turn us all into nostalgia zombies.’ This sentiment reflects a growing concern that the film industry is prioritizing profit over originality, leading to a decline in the quality and diversity of mainstream movies.
The Allure of the Familiar: Why Do We Love Remakes?
Despite the criticisms leveled against sequels and remakes, there’s no denying their enduring appeal. Remakes offer a chance to revisit beloved stories with a fresh perspective, while sequels allow us to reconnect with characters we’ve grown to love. For studios, these projects represent a relatively safe investment, as they come with built-in fan bases and established brand recognition.
According to TIME, ‘There’s always a new audience that’s never even seen the older movie, and an older audience that’s happy to revisit material they’ve enjoyed before. Who doesn’t want to try to reclaim familiar pleasures?’ This quote highlights the dual appeal of remakes and sequels, catering to both new viewers and longtime fans.
The Era of ‘It’s OK, It’s Fine’: Are Movies Getting Worse?
In recent years, there’s been a growing sense that mainstream movies are becoming increasingly generic and uninspired. With the rise of streaming services and the pressure to produce content quickly, studios may be cutting corners and sacrificing quality in the pursuit of quantity. This has led to what the article calls the era of the ‘It’s OK, it’s fine’ movie – films that are watchable but ultimately forgettable.
The TIME piece suggests, ‘But today’s mainstream movie products feel more slapdash than ever. It’s almost as if the studios/streamers making them are, by their own indifference to quality, willing people to stop caring. We’re deep in the era of the “It’s OK, it’s fine” movie.’ This critique points to a deeper issue within the industry: a lack of commitment to excellence and a willingness to settle for mediocrity.
A Glimmer of Hope: The Future of Film
Despite the challenges facing the film industry, there’s still reason to be optimistic. Independent filmmakers and smaller studios like Neon and A24 are pushing boundaries and creating original, thought-provoking movies. These companies are willing to take risks and give audiences something new, offering a refreshing alternative to the endless stream of sequels and remakes.
As TIME concludes, ‘plenty of filmmakers, young and old, are still managing to make independent films almost against all odds, and there’s a new breed of studio—exemplified by Neon and A24—that seeks to give audiences movies that feel original and surprising.’ This suggests that the future of film may lie in the hands of those who are willing to challenge the status quo and prioritize artistic vision over financial gain.
Final Thoughts: Is ‘Freakier Friday’ Worth Your Time?
‘Freakier Friday’ is a prime example of Hollywood’s current obsession with nostalgia and sequels. While the return of Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan may entice some viewers, the film ultimately fails to capture the charm and wit of the original. With its convoluted plot, reliance on cheap gags, and uninspired performances, ‘Freakier Friday’ is unlikely to leave a lasting impression.
In a world dominated by remakes and reboots, it’s more important than ever to support original voices and filmmakers who are willing to take risks. While enjoying a familiar story can be comforting, it’s crucial to embrace new ideas and perspectives. The future of film depends on our willingness to look beyond the nostalgia and demand something more from the industry. Ultimately, ‘Freakier Friday’ serves as a reminder that sometimes, the past is best left untouched.
Leave a Reply