The topic of sign-stealing has become a hot-button issue in the NFL. Recently, San Francisco 49ers defensive coordinator Robert Saleh called out the Jacksonville Jaguars for allegedly employing a sophisticated system to gain an advantage. Saleh pointed to Jaguars coach Liam Coen, an alumnus of Sean McVay’s coaching tree, as a key figure in this operation. This FYM News article dives deep into the accusations, examining the legality of sign-stealing, how teams like the Jaguars use formations, and the broader implications for the game.
Sign-stealing isn’t new in football, but the methods and extent can raise eyebrows. Saleh emphasized that he was not accusing the Jaguars of anything illegal. However, he noted the effectiveness of their approach. Coen responded by stating that his team works hard to identify tendencies through film study and formation analysis. Understanding the nuances of this practice is crucial for fans and analysts alike.
What is Legal vs. Illegal Sign-Stealing in the NFL?
The NFL permits teams to analyze broadcast tape and All-22 film to decipher opponents’ signals and tendencies. Coaches can also use information observed from the press box during games. However, sign-stealing becomes illegal when teams film signals from unauthorized areas, such as the sidelines. This distinction is critical in understanding the current debate.
Conor Orr of Sports Illustrated reports that coaches review television tape to identify words picked up by field microphones. Defensive coordinators also study quarterback cadences to anticipate plays. These tactics are all part of the strategic chess match that defines NFL games.
How Do the Jaguars Use Their Formations?
Saleh highlighted the Jaguars’ ability to use formations to gain insight into opponents’ signals. Jacksonville employs a balanced approach, using 2×2 formations (two receivers on each side) on 98 snaps and 3×1 formations (three receivers on one side, one on the other) on 75 snaps. This near-equal distribution makes it difficult for defenses to predict their plays.
TruMedia reports that the Jaguars also maintain similar run-pass splits in both formations. They pass 56% of the time out of 2×2 looks and 58% of the time in 3×1. These rates align closely with league averages, further complicating defensive strategies.
The Jaguars also utilize motion frequently, employing it on 64% of their snaps, which ranks fifth-highest in the NFL. Motion can force opponents to reveal their coverage schemes, providing valuable information to the offense.
Do the Jaguars Have Tendencies of Their Own?
While the Jaguars effectively disguise their intentions through formations, they may tip their hand based on personnel groupings. They use 11 personnel (one running back, one tight end, three receivers) on approximately 70% of their snaps, ranking 10th in the NFL. In contrast, they use 12 personnel (one back, two tight ends, two receivers) on 21% of snaps.
Significant run-pass splits emerge based on these personnel groupings. In 11 personnel, the Jaguars pass 68% of the time and run 32% of the time. Conversely, in 12 personnel, they pass 38% of the time and run 62% of the time. These inverse rates provide a clear indication of their likely play call.
The 12 personnel pass rate ranks 24th in the NFL, significantly below the league average of 45.6%. This tendency makes it easier for defenses to anticipate run plays when the Jaguars deploy multi-tight end formations.
Liam Coen Responds: Jaguars Just Work Hard
When questioned about Saleh’s comments, Liam Coen initially deflected, emphasizing the importance of focusing on their upcoming game. However, he later clarified that the Jaguars’ approach involves extensive film study and game planning.
Coen stated that his coaching staff works diligently throughout the week to identify indicators based on formation, motion, and pre-snap reads. This hard work aims to put players in the best position to succeed. His remarks underscore the importance of preparation and attention to detail in the NFL.
What Else Is Used to Steal Signs in the NFL?
In addition to film study, coaches analyze television tape to capture words picked up by field microphones. Defensive coordinators also mimic quarterback cadences to gain an edge. These methods, as Conor Orr notes, provide valuable insights into opponents’ play calls.
The use of All-22 film is also crucial, allowing teams to match hand signals and code words to plays. This comprehensive approach highlights the strategic depth of NFL coaching and the constant search for competitive advantages.
The McVay Coaching Tree Connection
Robert Saleh specifically mentioned the influence of Sean McVay’s coaching tree in the context of sign-stealing. He noted that coaches like Liam Coen, who have worked under McVay, are particularly adept at this practice. This connection suggests that McVay’s offensive philosophy emphasizes detailed analysis and exploitation of opponents’ tendencies.
Saleh also mentioned Kevin O’Connell of the Minnesota Vikings, another McVay disciple, as someone who excels in this area. This recurring theme underscores the impact of McVay’s coaching methods on the broader NFL landscape.
Conclusion
The accusations made by Robert Saleh against the Jacksonville Jaguars highlight the ongoing debate surrounding sign-stealing in the NFL. While legal, the practice raises questions about competitive fairness and the extent to which teams should go to gain an advantage.
Key takeaways from this analysis include the distinction between legal and illegal sign-stealing, the Jaguars’ balanced use of formations, and the influence of the Sean McVay coaching tree. As the NFL continues to evolve, teams will undoubtedly continue to explore new strategies to gain an edge, making the study of these tactics increasingly important.
Leave a Reply