The bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 remains a stark reminder of the devastating impact of terrorism. The new BBC drama, ‘The Bombing of Pan Am 103,’ attempts to explore the human stories behind this tragedy. However, according to a review in The Guardian, the series struggles to translate the weight of the event into compelling television. This article delves into the review’s key points, examining why the show might not fully capture the gravity and complexity of the Lockerbie disaster.
From concerns about sentimental portrayals to questions about dramatic depth, we’ll dissect the critique to understand why this well-intentioned series falls short. We will explore the reviewer’s arguments concerning the show’s focus, its handling of sensitive material, and its overall effectiveness in conveying the emotional and historical significance of the Pan Am 103 bombing.
The Lockerbie Bombing: A Tragedy Revisited
The bombing of Pan Am flight 103 on December 21, 1988, was an unprecedented act of terror that deeply affected both Britain and the United States. The flight, en route from Frankfurt to New York via London, exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, resulting in the deaths of 270 people. The aftermath saw a global demand for answers, yet the voices of the victims’ families often struggled to be heard amidst the chaos. The BBC drama aimed to highlight the hidden human cost of this tragedy, but the Guardian’s review suggests it missed the mark.
Many elements of the bombing remain murky to this day, further complicating efforts to portray the event accurately. The initial focus of the investigation quickly turned to the Middle East and North Africa, intensifying the international pressure to solve the case. According to the review, the series attempts to address how the dignity of the victims and the sensitivities of their loved ones were often overlooked, but fails to translate this sentiment into compelling drama.
Struggling to Find the Drama in Dignity
The Guardian review points out that ‘The Bombing of Pan Am 103’ tries to find its dramatic impetus in the hidden human cost and the trampling of the dignity of victims and their families. The series posits that more care should have been taken to respect the dead. However, the reviewer argues that the series struggles to turn this admirable sentiment into actual drama.
The review highlights specific scenes, such as the introduction of a girl clutching her teddy bear, later found charred, as feeling cheesy despite being rooted in reality. In contrast, the reviewer praises the portrayal of a Lockerbie boy who survives because he is out buying his sister’s gift as a ‘piercing happenstance,’ illustrating the mixed results of the show’s attempts to humanize the tragedy.
Visuals and Violence: A Stout Job?
According to The Guardian, the series effectively portrays the scale and violence that befell Lockerbie. The reviewer notes that the force of the debris and the tableau of a street on fire are startling. The sight of luggage scattered on a winding country road, illuminated by police car headlights, is described as a ‘horribly macabre scene,’ effectively capturing the early responders’ experience.
Despite these visually impressive moments, the review suggests that the drama fails to delve deeper into the emotional and psychological impact on the community. While the visuals convey the physical destruction, they do not necessarily translate into a compelling narrative that resonates with the audience on a human level.
Jurisdictional Disputes and Focus on Authority
The review highlights the series’ focus on jurisdictional squabbles between Scottish and American authorities. The character of DCS John Orr (played by Peter Mullan) is portrayed as fiercely protective of Scottish authority, which the reviewer suggests comes across as parochial and pompous. The series seems ‘genuinely exercised by the importance of Orr being in charge, in and of itself,’ which the reviewer finds misplaced.
This focus on jurisdictional disputes is seen as detracting from the more significant human stories. The reviewer questions whether the power struggles between investigators truly serve the narrative, or if they merely add unnecessary conflict without enhancing the audience’s understanding of the tragedy’s emotional core.
Compassion vs. Drama: A Delicate Balance
One of the series’ main themes is the compassionate response of the Lockerbie community. Locals insisted on staying with the bodies, and townswomen volunteered to clean and sort the victims’ clothing. The Guardian notes that while these are touching gestures, the scenes lack conflict or stakes, making them more like reporting than drama.
The review suggests that the series’ desire to pay service to the victims sometimes tips into sentimentality. For example, the delay in returning a Bible to the owner’s family and an FBI agent’s emotional response to a wrapped gift are cited as instances where the show’s viewpoint becomes muddled. The reviewer questions whether senior investigators would prioritize these gestures over solving a major international terror attack.
Sentimentality vs. Authenticity
The Guardian’s review questions whether the victim-centered approach, while well-intentioned, truly reflects the priorities of investigators at the time. The reviewer argues that while valuing the victims as individuals is commendable, it might not align with the practical realities faced by those tasked with solving a major international terror attack. The review challenges the show to sharpen its viewpoint in the remaining episodes and build a more coherent picture of the events and their aftermath.
Ultimately, the review concludes that ‘The Bombing of Pan Am 103’ knows its subject matter is important but isn’t sure why. This lack of clarity, according to the reviewer, undermines the series’ potential to offer a meaningful and impactful portrayal of the Lockerbie tragedy.
Final Verdict: Important Subject, Unsure Execution
In conclusion, ‘The Bombing of Pan Am 103’ on BBC aims to explore the human stories behind the Lockerbie tragedy but, according to The Guardian’s review, struggles to find its dramatic footing. The series is critiqued for its sentimental approach, lack of dramatic depth, and focus on jurisdictional squabbles, which detract from the emotional core of the event. While the show effectively portrays the scale and violence of the bombing, it fails to fully translate this into a compelling narrative.
The review raises important questions about the balance between paying service to the victims and creating authentic, engaging drama. As the series progresses, it remains to be seen whether it can sharpen its viewpoint and offer a more impactful portrayal of the Lockerbie tragedy’s lasting legacy.
Leave a Reply