The attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, last year continues to reverberate, with new details emerging from an upcoming book. The book recounts the aftermath of the attack, revealing that Trump’s staff initially believed he had been shot multiple times due to the extensive bleeding. This article explores these revelations, focusing on the key insights and background surrounding this event, with an emphasis on the perspective of political analyst Salena Zito. The incident not only underscores the heightened political tensions of the time but also offers a glimpse into the reactions and subsequent endorsements that shaped Trump’s campaign.
Salena Zito, known for her on-the-ground reporting and understanding of the American political landscape, provides valuable context to this event. By examining the details of the assassination attempt and its impact, we gain a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play during a crucial period in American politics. This article delves into the specifics of the attack, the immediate reactions, and the broader implications for Trump’s political trajectory.
The Butler Attack: A Close Call for Trump
On July 13, 2025, Donald Trump was giving a campaign speech in Butler, Pennsylvania, when a 20-year-old named Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire from a nearby rooftop. Secret Service agents quickly bundled Trump to the ground and rushed him to the hospital. According to the new book, 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, Trump was bleeding heavily. Staff members at the time thought he had sustained multiple gunshot wounds.
The excerpt published in The Washington Post details the scene:
“Trump was sitting up in bed, still wearing his suit. A bandage covered his ear. There was blood everywhere.”
This vivid description paints a picture of chaos and confusion, highlighting the severity of the situation and the immediate concern for Trump’s well-being.
The rapid response of the Secret Service and the subsequent medical attention were critical in ensuring Trump’s safety. The incident, however, left a lasting impression on those present, shaping perceptions and influencing subsequent political dynamics.
Staff Reactions: Initial Panic and Relief
The book recounts that top aides, including Susie Wiles, Steven Cheung, and Dan Scavino, were in a state of panic upon seeing Trump’s condition. Trump later told the authors, “It was bleeding like a b****. They thought I had four or five bullets in me because there was so much blood.” However, their relief was palpable when Trump began making jokes from his hospital bed, signaling that he was out of immediate danger.
This moment served as a turning point, illustrating Trump’s resilience and ability to maintain composure under pressure. The aides’ initial fear quickly turned to reassurance as they witnessed Trump’s characteristic humor and strength. This narrative reinforces the image of Trump as a figure who can weather significant challenges, a trait often emphasized by his supporters.
Unexpected Endorsements: Bezos and Zuckerberg’s Support
Following the assassination attempt, Trump’s campaign experienced an unexpected surge of support from prominent figures, including Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg. According to the book, Bezos expressed that Trump’s instincts revealed his true character and extended an offer of friendship. Zuckerberg reportedly commented that seeing Trump “pump his fist in the air” after being shot was “one of the most badass things” he’d ever seen.
These endorsements marked a significant shift in the political landscape, as both Bezos and Zuckerberg had previously been critical of Trump. Their change of heart underscored the profound impact of the assassination attempt on public perception and political alliances. The support from these influential figures provided a considerable boost to Trump’s campaign, signaling a broader acceptance and approval of his leadership.
Elon Musk’s Endorsement: A ‘First Buddy’ Joins the Fold
Adding to the wave of endorsements, Tesla’s Elon Musk officially endorsed Trump on July 13. Musk posted on X, “I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery.” This endorsement further solidified Trump’s position and added another powerful voice to his growing list of supporters. Musk’s backing was particularly significant given his influence in the tech industry and his reputation as a visionary leader.
The alignment of Musk with Trump’s campaign signaled a broader coalition forming around the former president. These endorsements not only provided financial and political support but also enhanced Trump’s credibility and appeal to a wider audience. The collective backing from Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Musk painted a picture of a resurgent campaign gaining momentum in the aftermath of a crisis.
Biden’s Call: An Awkward Exchange
The book also mentions a brief and awkward call between Trump and then-President Joe Biden. The exchange occurred shortly after their tense debate and highlighted the strained relationship between the two political rivals. Despite the tension, Trump described the call as “very nice, actually,” suggesting a moment of civility amidst political conflict.
This call, though brief, underscores the complexities of political interactions, even in moments of crisis. The fact that Biden reached out to Trump reflects a sense of duty and responsibility, while Trump’s positive assessment of the call indicates a willingness to acknowledge gestures of goodwill, regardless of political differences.
Salena Zito’s Perspective: Understanding the American Heartland
Salena Zito, a noted political analyst and journalist, brings a unique perspective to understanding the events surrounding the Trump assassination attempt and its aftermath. Known for her ability to connect with and report on the American heartland, Zito’s insights provide valuable context to the political dynamics at play. Her work often focuses on the perspectives of everyday Americans, offering a nuanced view of their concerns and motivations.
Zito’s analysis could shed light on how the assassination attempt influenced public opinion in key regions and among specific demographics. Her understanding of the cultural and economic factors driving political sentiment in these areas would provide a more comprehensive picture of the event’s impact. By examining Zito’s writings and commentary, we can gain a deeper appreciation of the complexities and nuances of American politics during this period.
Conclusion: Resilience, Endorsements, and Political Realities
The attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, was a pivotal moment that revealed much about his resilience, the shifting alliances in American politics, and the underlying tensions of the time. The initial panic of his staff, the unexpected endorsements from tech moguls, and the awkward call with President Biden all contribute to a narrative of a campaign forged in crisis.
The new details emerging from the book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America provide a vivid account of the events and their immediate aftermath. By examining the reactions, endorsements, and political dynamics surrounding this incident, we gain a deeper understanding of the factors that shaped Trump’s political trajectory. The insights of analysts like Salena Zito further enrich this understanding, offering valuable context and perspective on the American political landscape.
Ultimately, the story of the Butler assassination attempt is a testament to the unpredictable nature of politics and the enduring impact of significant events on public perception and political outcomes. It serves as a reminder of the importance of resilience, adaptability, and the ability to navigate complex and challenging circumstances in the pursuit of political success.
Leave a Reply